• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

What is Free Evolution?

Free evolution is the concept that natural processes can lead to the development of organisms over time. This includes the evolution of new species and change in appearance of existing ones.

Many examples have been given of this, including various varieties of fish called sticklebacks that can be found in salt or fresh water, and walking stick insect varieties that prefer specific host plants. These mostly reversible traits permutations do not explain the fundamental changes in basic body plans.

Evolution through Natural Selection

Scientists have been fascinated by the evolution of all living creatures that live on our planet for many centuries. Charles Darwin's natural selectivity is the most well-known explanation. This is because individuals who are better-adapted are able to reproduce faster and longer than those who are less well-adapted. As time passes, the number of well-adapted individuals grows and eventually forms a new species.

Natural selection is a process that is cyclical and involves the interaction of 3 factors including reproduction, variation and inheritance. Mutation and sexual reproduction increase genetic diversity in a species. Inheritance is the transfer of a person's genetic characteristics to his or her offspring that includes recessive and dominant alleles. Reproduction is the process of producing viable, fertile offspring, which includes both asexual and sexual methods.

All of these factors must be in harmony for natural selection to occur. If, for example the dominant gene allele causes an organism reproduce and live longer than the recessive gene allele then the dominant allele becomes more prevalent in a group. If the allele confers a negative survival advantage or reduces the fertility of the population, it will be eliminated. The process is self-reinforced, meaning that an organism that has a beneficial trait is more likely to survive and reproduce than an individual with an inadaptive trait. The more offspring that an organism has the more fit it is, which is measured by its capacity to reproduce itself and survive. Individuals with favorable characteristics, such as having a long neck in the giraffe, or bright white patterns on male peacocks are more likely to others to survive and reproduce which eventually leads to them becoming the majority.

Natural selection is an aspect of populations and not on individuals. This is an important distinction from the Lamarckian theory of evolution, which states that animals acquire traits through use or neglect. If a giraffe expands its neck to reach prey and the neck grows larger, then its children will inherit this characteristic. The differences in neck size between generations will increase until the giraffe is unable to breed with other giraffes.

Evolution through Genetic Drift

Genetic drift occurs when alleles from a gene are randomly distributed within a population. Eventually, one of them will reach fixation (become so common that it is unable to be removed by natural selection) and the other alleles drop to lower frequencies. This can result in dominance in extreme. Other alleles have been virtually eliminated and heterozygosity been reduced to a minimum. In a small population, this could lead to the complete elimination of recessive alleles. This scenario is called the bottleneck effect. It is typical of the evolutionary process that occurs when a large number individuals migrate to form a group.

A phenotypic 'bottleneck' can also occur when the survivors of a catastrophe like an outbreak or mass hunting incident are concentrated in a small area. The remaining individuals will be largely homozygous for the dominant allele, meaning that they all have the same phenotype and therefore have the same fitness characteristics. This situation could be caused by earthquakes, war, or even plagues. Whatever the reason the genetically distinct group that is left might be susceptible to genetic drift.

Walsh Lewens, Walsh and Ariew define drift as a deviation from expected values due to differences in fitness. They cite a famous example of twins that are genetically identical and have the exact same phenotype and yet one is struck by lightening and dies while the other lives and reproduces.

This kind of drift could be crucial in the evolution of a species. But, it's not the only method to develop. Natural selection is the most common alternative, in which mutations and migration maintain phenotypic diversity within the population.

Stephens asserts that there is a huge difference between treating drift like an actual cause or force, 에볼루션 바카라 사이트, Read the Full Content, and considering other causes, 에볼루션 바카라 무료체험 바카라 무료 [https://junker-mccormack.federatedjournals.Com/] such as selection mutation and migration as forces and causes. He claims that a causal process account of drift allows us to distinguish it from the other forces, and this distinction is crucial. He also argues that drift has a direction: that is, 바카라 에볼루션 it tends to eliminate heterozygosity. It also has a magnitude, which is determined by the size of population.

Evolution through Lamarckism

When students in high school study biology they are often introduced to the work of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744 - 1829). His theory of evolution, often referred to as "Lamarckism is based on the idea that simple organisms develop into more complex organisms taking on traits that are a product of an organism's use and disuse. Lamarckism is typically illustrated with a picture of a giraffe stretching its neck longer to reach higher up in the trees. This could cause the necks of giraffes that are longer to be passed onto their offspring who would grow taller.

Lamarck was a French zoologist and, in his opening lecture for his course on invertebrate Zoology at the Museum of Natural History in Paris on the 17th May 1802, he introduced an original idea that fundamentally challenged the previous understanding of organic transformation. In his opinion living things had evolved from inanimate matter through an escalating series of steps. Lamarck was not the only one to suggest that this could be the case, but the general consensus is that he was the one having given the subject its first broad and thorough treatment.

The most popular story is that Lamarckism was an opponent to Charles Darwin's theory of evolutionary natural selection, and both theories battled each other in the 19th century. Darwinism eventually prevailed and led to the creation of what biologists today refer to as the Modern Synthesis. The theory argues that acquired traits can be passed down through generations and instead argues that organisms evolve through the selective influence of environmental factors, including Natural Selection.

Lamarck and his contemporaries supported the notion that acquired characters could be passed on to future generations. However, this notion was never a central part of any of their theories on evolution. This is partly because it was never tested scientifically.

It has been more than 200 year since Lamarck's birth and in the field of age genomics, there is a growing evidence base that supports the heritability acquired characteristics. This is referred to as "neo Lamarckism", or more generally epigenetic inheritance. This is a variant that is as valid as the popular Neodarwinian model.

Evolution through adaptation

One of the most common misconceptions about evolution is that it is a result of a kind of struggle to survive. In reality, this notion misrepresents natural selection and ignores the other forces that drive evolution. The struggle for survival is more effectively described as a struggle to survive within a particular environment, which may be a struggle that involves not only other organisms, but also the physical environment itself.

To understand how evolution functions it is beneficial to consider what adaptation is. The term "adaptation" refers to any specific characteristic that allows an organism to live and reproduce in its environment. It can be a physiological feature, such as feathers or fur or a behavior such as a tendency to move into shade in the heat or leaving at night to avoid cold.

The survival of an organism is dependent on its ability to draw energy from the environment and interact with other living organisms and their physical surroundings. The organism should possess the right genes to create offspring and be able find sufficient food and resources. The organism should also be able to reproduce at the rate that is suitable for its specific niche.

These elements, in conjunction with mutation and gene flow can result in changes in the ratio of alleles (different varieties of a particular gene) in the population's gene pool. This change in allele frequency can result in the emergence of novel traits and eventually new species as time passes.

A lot of the traits we appreciate in plants and animals are adaptations. For instance lung or gills that draw oxygen from air feathers and fur for insulation, long legs to run away from predators and camouflage for hiding. However, a proper understanding of adaptation requires a keen eye to the distinction between physiological and behavioral characteristics.

Physiological traits like thick fur and gills are physical characteristics. The behavioral adaptations aren't, such as the tendency of animals to seek out companionship or move into the shade during hot weather. Additionally, it is important to understand that a lack of forethought does not mean that something is an adaptation. Inability to think about the consequences of a decision even if it appears to be logical, can cause it to be unadaptive.